{"id":3254,"date":"2023-12-19T19:52:02","date_gmt":"2023-12-19T19:52:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/?p=3254"},"modified":"2023-12-19T19:52:02","modified_gmt":"2023-12-19T19:52:02","slug":"land-abandonment-succession-and-restoration-the-wolf-run-grassland-restoration-project-at-the-missouri-botanical-gardens-shaw-nature-reserve","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/land-abandonment-succession-and-restoration-the-wolf-run-grassland-restoration-project-at-the-missouri-botanical-gardens-shaw-nature-reserve\/","title":{"rendered":"Land Abandonment, Succession, and Restoration: The Wolf Run Grassland Restoration Project at the Missouri Botanical Garden\u2019s Shaw Nature Reserve"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>By: Mike Saxton and Calvin Maginel<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Mike Saxton (<a href=\"mailto:mike.saxton@mobot.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">mike.saxton@mobot.org<\/a>) is the Manager of Restoration and Land Stewardship, and Calvin Maginel (<a href=\"mailto:cmaginel@mobot.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">cmaginel@mobot.org<\/a>) is the Ecological Resource Scientist at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.missouribotanicalgarden.org\/plan-your-visit\/family-of-attractions\/shaw-nature-reserve\/conservation-at-shaw-nature-reserve\/habitat-restoration\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Shaw Nature Reserve<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Since 1950, over 1-billon acres of agricultural land have been abandoned worldwide. In certain landscape contexts, unassisted spontaneous recovery of high levels of native biodiversity in abandoned fields is possible while in others, like the Midwest USA, fallow fields rarely develop into biologically rich habitats. To achieve the ambitious goals of the UN <a href=\"https:\/\/www.decadeonrestoration.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Decade of Ecosystem Restoration<\/a>, land managers and ecologists need to better understand how to assist the regeneration and ecological restoration of these highly altered landscapes.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1925, the Missouri Botanical Garden purchased 1,300 acres of battered farm ground in Gray Summit, MO \u2013 approximately 35 miles (56 km) west of St. Louis \u2013 to escape the deleterious impact urban air pollution was having on horticultural collections in St. Louis City. The intended uses of this acreage were to: (1) propagate and grow plants, trees, and shrubs for the main Garden\u2019s displays and (2) establish an arboretum focusing on woody plant collections. The site was officially named the Shaw Arboretum in 1933. After decades of development, many non-essential operations at the Arboretum were eliminated in 1958 and many fields were abandoned to allow spontaneous successional change. In 2000, the Shaw Arboretum was renamed Shaw Nature Reserve to reflect its contemporary mission to demonstrate, test, and inspire responsible stewardship practices through education, restoration, and protection of natural habitats and public enjoyment of the natural world. Today the Nature Reserve consists of 2,400 acres of varied habitat in various stages of restoration and revised management, including the use of prescribed fire.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prior to European settlement, the natural plant communities and ecosystems of the area were fire adapted, open oak-hickory woodlands and xeric glades with gallery forests along riparian corridors. Post-settlement, woodlands were clear-cut with some woodlots left to passively regenerate while others were converted to row crop agriculture.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Wolf Run Grassland Restoration&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2016, Nature Reserve staff set an ambitious goal to bring all 2,400 acres of the site into active management to promote native biodiversity by the year 2030. This effort will include restoring open pastures and former row crop fields, a relatively simple process. A much more challenging effort will be reclaiming 120 acres of old fields with 60+ year successional development, which is our current Wolf Run Grassland Restoration project.&nbsp;The 120 acre project area was initially \u201cwasted farm ground\u201d that had erosion gullies \u201cwhere a freight train could pass without you seeing it\u201d, according to August Beilmann, former Arboretum Director from 1941 to 1956. The entire project area was re-sculpted and smoothed by a bulldozer in 1953 and then converted to bluegrass (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/25512740\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Poa pratensis<\/em><\/a>). \u201cEvery piece of this land that looks so likely to be just right was laboriously rebuilt,\u201d said Beilmann in a 1974 interview.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-imagery_mbg-archives_nher-1.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"624\" height=\"371\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-imagery_mbg-archives_nher-1.png?resize=624%2C371&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3258\" style=\"width:840px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-imagery_mbg-archives_nher-1.png?w=624&amp;ssl=1 624w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-imagery_mbg-archives_nher-1.png?resize=300%2C178&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 624px) 100vw, 624px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Wolf Run Grassland Restoration project area in ca. 1945 showing open fields (light green) maintained through cattle grazing and mowing with trees occupying wet-weather streams and ditches (dark green). Photo: MBG Archives<\/em>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Since 1958 when areas including the Wolf Run Grassland Restoration were removed from mowing and grazing, the site was encroached upon and became dominated by eastern red cedar (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/9400157\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Juniperus virginiana<\/em><\/a>), the non-native invasive shrubs Amur honeysuckle (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/6000471\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Lonicera maackii<\/em><\/a>), and border privet (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/23000161\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Ligustrum obtusifolium<\/em><\/a>), as well as slippery elm (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/33300072\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Ulmus rubra<\/em><\/a>), shingle oak (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/13100083\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Quercus imbricaria<\/em><\/a>) and ash (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/40010900\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Fraxinus<\/em><\/a>) species, the latter of which which are in severe decline due to the emerald ash borer.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These degraded woodlands had little native ground flora and were highly infested with non-native shrubs. Tree abundance and species composition had no historic analog. When setting ecological restoration goals for the area, staff determined that much of the site could not be managed as an open oak-hickory woodland, which would have existed at the site pre-settlement.&nbsp; A new vision was needed.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Goals for the Wolf Run Grassland Restoration project<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Establish a mosaic of 80 acres (~32 ha) of prairie, 15 acres (~6 ha) of savanna and 25 acres (~10 ha) of oak-hickory woodlands<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Maximize native flora diversity and aggressively control invasive shrub species&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Manage with periodic, dormant-season prescribed fire&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2021, Nature Reserve staff marked hundreds of native trees to retain including white, red, bur and black oaks (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/13100028\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Quercus alba<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/13100118\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Q. rubra<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/13100002\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Q. macrocarpa<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/13100155\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Q. velutina<\/em><\/a><em>)<\/em> and shagbark hickory (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/16700033\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Carya ovata<\/em><\/a>) and bitternut hickory (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/16700018\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>C. cordiformis<\/em><\/a>)<em>.<\/em> Drainages and wet weather streams were left with a 50 ft. (~15 m)&nbsp; untreated buffer zone while a perennial creek flowing through the unit retained a 150 ft. (~46 m) untouched buffer. A logger removed unmarked trees from the area, with the commercial value of the timber offsetting the cost of the removal. Following US Fish and Wildlife Service recovery management guidelines for the Indiana bat (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fws.gov\/species\/indiana-bat-myotis-sodalis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Myotis sodalis<\/em><\/a>) \u2014 a federally endangered species \u2014 trees were only removed from November 1<sup>st<\/sup> to April 1<sup>st<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2021_esri_nher.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"624\" height=\"401\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2021_esri_nher.png?resize=624%2C401&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3261\" style=\"width:842px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2021_esri_nher.png?w=624&amp;ssl=1 624w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2021_esri_nher.png?resize=300%2C193&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 624px) 100vw, 624px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Wolf Run Grassland Restoration project area pre-thinning (2021), approximately 60 years after land abandonment. Note the dark green areas are dominated by eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), a native tree that rapidly colonizes abandoned or disturbed lands in the Midwest. Historically, this fire-sensitive tree species primarily occurred on rocky outcrops and bluffs that served as refugia from periodic fires that were common in the pre-European settlement landscape. Photo: ESRI<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2023_esri_nher.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"624\" height=\"398\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2023_esri_nher.png?resize=624%2C398&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3263\" style=\"width:839px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2023_esri_nher.png?w=624&amp;ssl=1 624w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-grassland-2023_esri_nher.png?resize=300%2C191&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 624px) 100vw, 624px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Wolf Run Grassland Restoration project area post-thinning (2023). Photo: ESRI<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-burning_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-burning_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3265\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Forestry contractor equipment was used to remove most woody biomass greater than 4.5 in. (~11 cm) in diameter and left behind mostly small-diameter slash. A bulldozer was used to collect the debris into 600 piles that were subsequently burned. Photo: Mike Saxton<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The Restoration team has spent the last 9 months focusing on the removal of stumps for the project area. Stumps can be a substantial hazard for vehicles, equipment and staff safety. To seed native species and effectively manage the area for invasive species in perpetuity, the stumps must be ground down or cut flush to the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-stump-mulch_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-stump-mulch_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3266\" style=\"width:840px;height:auto\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Skid loader mounted stump grinder removing stumps. Photo: M. Saxton<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Concurrent to this effort has been the site preparation step of chemically treating all of the invasive species and the disturbance driven annual vegetation that emerged post-land clearing [primarily fireweed (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/2700691\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Erechtites hieraciifolius<\/em>)<\/a>, mare\u2019s tail (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/2700697\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Erigeron canadensis<\/em><\/a>), ragweed (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/2701648\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Ambrosia artemisiifolia<\/em><\/a>)<em> <\/em>and fox tail (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/25527656\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Setaria pumila<\/em><\/a>)]. This step is necessary because diverse, healthy native plant communities have not existed in these areas in more than 100 years. Consequently, there is no native seedbank to support the unassisted spontaneous recovery of native perennial herbaceous species in these highly degraded acres.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In areas where stumps have not been cleared, traditional equipment (tractor boom sprayers and UTV mounted spray rigs) for applying herbicide are ineffective. The Nature Reserve hired a contractor that specializes in drone-assisted aerial herbicide applications. The drone flies 12 ft. (~37 m) above vegetation and can self-navigate around trees and other hazards. The unit carries a total of 8 gallons (~30 L) and sprays approximately 3 gallons of herbicide per acre. The effective width of each pass is 25 ft. (~8 m). A single battery powers the drone, with a flight time of 7.5 minutes and a re-charge time of 6 minutes. When the herbicide tank runs out, the drone re-deploys to the fill up location, is refilled by the contractor, and then returns to where it left off.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-drone_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-drone_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3269\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Aerial drone sprayer used to eliminate undesirable vegetation. Photo: M. Saxton<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The last step after the undesirable trees have been removed, biomass\/debris has been burned, the stumps have been ground and invasive species have been controlled, is the final ground preparation. Currently, in 2023, we are again smoothing out erosion gullies and clearing away the last remnants of woody debris with a bulldozer. This effort will ensure effective seed-to-soil contact when we sow native seed in January 2024 and will enhance our ability to successfully search for invasive species in the coming years by eliminating deep ruts and rills.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-historic-photo_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/wolf-run-historic-photo_mbg_nher.png?ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3271\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Above: Bulldozer in 1953 eliminating erosion rills in Wolf Run Grassland Restoration project area. Below: Bulldozer completing site preparation for native seed addition (2023).&nbsp; Top Photo: St. Louis Globe Democrat, Bottom Photo: M. Saxton<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Native Seeding and Experimentation to promote Biodiversity Recovery&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During the growing season of 2023, the Restoration team at the Nature Reserve has been feverishly collecting seed for this 2024 seeding effort. More than 1,100 lbs. (~500 kg) of bulk, milled seed from ~200 locally collected native tallgrass prairie and open oak-hickory woodland species will be used in the restoration planting. Additionally, these acres are enrolled in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nrcs.usda.gov\/programs-initiatives\/eqip-environmental-quality-incentives\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">EQIP<\/a> \u2013 part of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and we must purchase viability-tested seed to meet the minimum required specifications of the contract. The hand-collected seed together with the pure live seed (PLS) \u2013 percentage of viable seed in a seed lot \u2013 purchased from commercial vendors will provide us with ample species and volume of seed to effectively cover the 40 acres (~16 ha) to be planted this winter.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Concurrent with the preparation effort, we initiated a research study, which will help inform our work and the broader research community on plant recruitment amongst scraped soils that have been inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi and those that have not. This study includes paired species from the same genus that have different CC-values, short for <a href=\"https:\/\/moprairie.org\/2020\/06\/26\/plant-conservatism-cc-values\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">coefficients of conservatism<\/a>, which represents a species\u2019 tolerance of environmental degradation, or its fidelity to intact remnant or long-restored habitats, as determined by local botanical experts. Ecologists generally expect species that are dependent on stable intact communities (higher CC-values) to be more reliant on mycorrhizae connections to establish and flourish. Species with high CC-values tend to establish poorly in restoration sites, which is one of the reasons to pursue this study. Some examples from the ten herbaceous pairs of native species include sedges (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/9901515\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Carex bushii<\/em><\/a> [CC = 4] and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/9900121\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Carex bicknellii<\/em><\/a> [CC = 10]), grasses (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/25539714\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Sporobolus compositus<\/em><\/a> [CC = 3] and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/25510763\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Bouteloua curtipendula<\/em><\/a> [CC = 7]), and forbs (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/50283255\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Oligoneuron rigidum<\/em><\/a> [CC = 5] and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tropicos.org\/name\/50203993\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Oligoneuron album<\/em><\/a> [CC = 9]).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We added all 20 species at the same rate of pure live seed to provide each species an equal opportunity to establish. Initial analyses after one growing season indicate that low CC-value species germinated more successfully, producing more seedlings and greater percent cover than the high CC-value species, regardless of inoculation. We expect the addition of mycorrhizal fungi to have the greatest effects on species during the first couple of years after germination. If the mycorrhizae associate with the roots of the high-CC species more than the low-CC species, this may help them grow faster or be more resistant to future stress. Future monitoring will show us if there are long-term effects of inoculation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To check for updates on restoration activities and results from experimental studies, please visit our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.missouribotanicalgarden.org\/plan-your-visit\/family-of-attractions\/shaw-nature-reserve\/conservation-at-shaw-nature-reserve\/habitat-restoration#:~:text=Wolf%20Run%20Grassland%20Restoration&amp;text=This%20area%20was%20farmed%20until,early%20successional%20trees%2C%20primarily%20cedars.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">webpage<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/seed-barrels_mbg_nher.jpg?ssl=1\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"552\" height=\"391\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/mbgecologicalrestoration.wordpress.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/seed-barrels_mbg_nher.jpg?resize=552%2C391&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3272\" style=\"width:838px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/seed-barrels_mbg_nher.jpg?w=552&amp;ssl=1 552w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/seed-barrels_mbg_nher.jpg?resize=300%2C213&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 552px) 100vw, 552px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Barrels of hand-collected seed connected to a seed dryer, which pumps air through tubes into the barrels to eliminate mold &amp; moisture. Photo: M. Saxton<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mike Saxton and Calvin Maginel describe a project restoring 80 acres of prairie, savanna, and oak-hickory woodland at Shaw Nature Reserve in eastern Missouri, USA.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3275,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[26,27,31],"tags":[222,228,285,334,363,593,613,710,784,794,951,955],"class_list":["post-3254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-missouri","category-north-america","category-shaw-nature-reserve","tag-climate-change","tag-coefficient-of-conservatism","tag-drone","tag-eqip","tag-fire","tag-mycorrhizae","tag-nature","tag-prairie","tag-savanna","tag-seed-collection","tag-wolf-run","tag-woodland"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nher.blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/banner-image.png?fit=539%2C398&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3254\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}